Email meTwShiloh (at) gmail (dot) com
My Flickr Photos
- Afghanistan africa America animal rights animals apocalypse Army Blog Babble Blog news blue oyster cult book reviews Books Cool Stuff counterinsurgency Crime critical thinking Daily Life dogs domestic intelligence Downloads economics environmental issues Finland food fusion centers gaming gangs history homeland security Homeland Security Round Table horror humor Intelligence intelligence analysis international affairs iran Iraq Kvick Tänkare law enforcement machiavelli media Military military history movies Music narcotics National Security new jersey news olympics peacekeeping Peter Kalm Photography Politics Putin reviews role playing games Russia scandinavia science science fiction Shiloh street gangs Survival Sweden Swedes Terrorism torture Travel Uncategorized urban issues War Stories work wotw zombies
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Unlock the archives
Monthly Archives: January 2010
I warned you. Don’t say you didn’t have time to prepare. King Karl Gustav has begun unleashing his terrible hordes upon the rest of the Earth like a modern day Genghis Khan. He’s begun by forcing the Finns into a humiliating show of submission by giving up some of their territory.
Sweden is set to undergo a territorial expansion following a government decision on Thursday which will alter the border with Finland to Sweden’s advantage.
In the north, the border is partially defined by a groove along the bottom of the Torne river which separates Finland from Sweden.
A joint Finnish-Swedish border commission has now registered that the groove has moved somewhat in the last quarter century.
Yeah, right. An underwater groove just moves all by itself. Next you’re gonna tell me that the climate is ‘changing’. It’s clear the King of Sweden has formed an alliance with the Mole Men who are engaging in a bit of clandestine groove moving.
This past weekend I made a Spicy Galangal-Coconut Mussels Soup which was very good and very easy. The taste was a nice mix of hot and sweet and it went fast.
I couldn’t find galangal and so substituted ginger (which it is related to) and replaced the chicken stock with fish broth. While I didn’t have any, it would go well with some crusty bread.
3 shallots, sliced
2 jalapenos, sliced with seeds
5 slices galangal
2 pounds PEI mussels, scrubbed
2 tablespoons fish sauce
4 cups chicken stock
1 cup coconut milk
Juice of 5 limes
Canola oil to cook
Kosher salt and freshly ground black pepper to taste
In a stock pot over high heat coated lightly with oil, saute shallots, jalapenos and galangal until slightly softened and fragrant, about 1 minute. Add mussels and deglaze with fish sauce and add stock and lime juice. Cover and let come to a simmer and cook for about 5 minutes, until mussels have opened. Uncover, check that mussels have opened, add coconut milk and check for flavor and season, if necessary.
I also tried to make a Florida Snapper with Galangal and Jalapeno Curry (recipe here) but in addition to having to substitute galangal with ginger (not a deal breaker) I substituted the snapper (very expensive here) with basa which, while ok, I don’t think was flavorful enough to compete with all the other ingredients. Mrs. TwS enjoyed it very much but I’d recommend going with the snapper.
There’s a lot of hysteria over the possibility that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed might be tried in federal court in NY. In fact, the pushback from politicians and the public is so intense that the administration is reportedly considering moving the venue somewhere else.
I do not agree.
The agruments against giving KSM a trial revolve around (at least) the following points:
- We shouldn’t give terrorists constitutional rights
- The law enforcement system prevents us from getting needed information and puts Americans at risk to future attacks
- A public trial would provide the terrorist with a forum for spreading his views
- The trial would make NYC a terrorist target
Quite frankly, I have no idea why these ideas made it out of whatever elementary school they came from. They just aren’t serious. They are, however, effective political weapons with which one can attempt to win votes in the upcoming elections. Allow me to deconstruct these arguments:
Al-Qaeda is really Spinal Tap. NYC is already a terrorist target. For years we’ve said it’s the prize of al-Qaeda, the holy grail (if I may mix my religious symbols). Arguing that a KSM trial somehow reminds al-Qaeda that NYC exists or bumps it up on their priority list is a bit like arguing that your amplifier is better because it goes all the way up to 11.
It’s bad symbolism. A KSM appearance in NYC would be bad symbolism if he came to town riding in a chariot to be crowned the king of the city. How exactly does this guy win by being dragged in chains to face justice in the very city he attacked? In ancient Rome, enemies of the state were brought back to the capital to face justice. Caesar didn’t kill Vercingetorix in some backwater village in Gual after he defeated his revolt. He brought him back to Rome to demonstrate to the world that you don’t mess with the big dog.
Information, rights and a public forum. I lump these together because they’re all nonsense individually and in any combination. How can I say that? Because we have another terrorism case going on right now that involves a terrorist attack on American soil, the accused was afforded all the rights under the constitution despite the fact he publicly proclaimed that he had personal knowledge of imminent terrorist attacks and he is being given a public forum to espouse his hateful ideology. The terrorist? Scott Roeder.
Now, others may say that his case is different because he’s an American citizen and so has to be afforded those rights and a forum but allow me to pose a thought experiment. If KSM was an American citizen, does anyone thing we wouldn’t be having this same, exact conversation? After all, Jose Padilla is an American citizen and he wasn’t afforded his constitutional rights. He was tortured for information.
So why was Roeder allowed to ‘lawyer up’ without having the thumbscrews put to him to find out what other Americans were at risk?
What if Roeder’s name was really Hadem al-Salaam and he said ‘allah akbar’ before gunning down Tiller?*
This is where our current administration drops the ball. We continue to allow the paranoid fantasies of the Cheney cabal drive how we view these issues.
No, the best way to deal with terrorists is to demonstrate how ultimately impotent they are. That, despite their pathetic attempts they will always fail to destroy or twist our system of governance.
*Now I realize Nidal Hasan could be used as a counter-argument to this point and so allow me to present two ways to read the events fo the Ft. Hood shooting in terms of what I’m talking about here.
- While Hasan is a member of the military and clearly falls within the pervue of the military judicial system I don’t see how that would stand up to people who think we need to do everything possible (rather than everything practical or everything prudent) to prevent future attacks. I think one significant point is that there doesn’t appear to ever have been an indication that Hasan was anything more than a ‘one-off’ event. He wasn’t connected to a larger, coordinated plot about which information could be derived.
- I could just be talking out of my wazoo and just got beat up by a straw man of my own making.
Outward Bound and the Sierra Club have partnered to allow veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan to partake in free expeditions.
China is talking about enacting legislation outlawing the eating of dogs (and cats, but who cares about them?)!
Finland is thinking about lower the voting age to 16 for local elections. Before you poo-poo that, allow me to remind you that Alexander the Great became king at 20 and Augustus became heir to Caesar’s fortunes at 18. Why shouldn’t 16 year olds get some exposure to the world they’re about to inherent?
I was reading through the latest issue of Homeland Security Affairs this weekend and there’s an article titled “Changing Homeland Security: Twelve Questions From 2009” (http://www.hsaj.org/pages/volume6/issue1/pdfs/6.1.1.pdf) that I was going to blog about but I really think it would benefit more from a hashing out of its ideas from multiple perspectives. Therefore, I asked a number of others to participate in a virtual round table to hash out these questions over the months ahead. So, beginning in February we’ll be highlighting one of Bellavita’s questions and discussing it from our various perspectives.
We’re not only in a new decade but fast approaching ten years since 9/11 and it seems as if we’re still operating under assumptions that were made in those early, hectic moments and days after the attacks. At some point, we should take a moment and bring them out, dust them off and see if they make as much sense now as they did when we thought color coding our threats was a good idea.
So…please feel free to participate in any way you’d like: comment on our blogs or post on your own. The questions we’ll be discussing include:
1. Why is it so difficult to make risk-based decisions in homeland security?
2. Why are we unable to measure the relationship between homeland security expenditures and preparedness?
3. Why is illegal immigration a homeland security issue?
4. Why is FEMA still a part of the Department of Homeland Security?
5. What can the nation realistically expect from its intelligence apparatus?
6. How does technology contribute to homeland security, and how does it make us more vulnerable?
7. Are the direct and indirect costs of security – for example aviation security — worth the benefits?
8. How important is cyber security?
9. Can the values of security and privacy be complementary, or must they be
10. Under what conditions will the United States torture people?
11. Is it necessary to understand Islam to develop an effective counterterrorism policy?
12. What can the homeland security enterprise learn from the apparent success managing the H1N1 pandemic?
You really, really need to read Steve Coll’s prepared remarks for the Armed Services Committee. Very nice summary of the current state of al-Qaeda. The parts I thought worthy of note:
Al Qaeda the organization has never been tested by a succession crisis because its two foundational leaders have remained at large for so long.
This is, of course, a huge advantage for us. We’ve got a system that can survive poor leadership, bad strategic decisions and attacks. Once bin Laden and Zawahiri go there’s no telling what will happen. In that regard, while it’d be better to capture or kill those guys we still win if we run their clock out.
One recent, particularly rigorous poll was published in 2009 by The Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, entitled, “Public Opinion in the Islamic World on Terrorism, Al Qaeda and U.S. Policies.” It found that support for Al Qaeda-conceived attacks against American civilians in the U.S. homeland, such as the attack attempted aboard Flight 253, is virtually negligible in a diverse array of heavily populated Muslim-majority countries. In Pakistan, where anti-American feeling has reached a fevered pitch, only nine percent supported such attacks; in Indonesia, the number was five percent.
In other words, enough of this Islam is inherently linked with violence nonsense.
Yet the outlook of Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri is not merely political. It is also millenarian, in the sense that both of them believe, as they often repeat, that they have been called by God to lead a war whose outcome is pre-ordained and will only finish at the end of Earthly time.…it is now clear that the construction of a political strategy has proven to be beyond their abilities. Al Qaeda’s political appeal seems to have crested and barring provocative mistakes by the United States, or allies such as India and Israel, it is hard to see how that appeal can be broadly revived. (italics added)
Translation: Don’t bomb Iran. Don’t start salivating at the chance to torture people. In short, the only way al-Qaeda is going to gain ground here is if we give them a hand up.
In a strategic or global sense, Al Qaeda seems to be in the process of defeating itself. Its political isolation in the Muslim world has set the stage for the United States and allied governments, with persistence, concentrated effort, and perhaps some luck, to finally destroy central Al Qaeda’s leadership along the Afghan-Pakistan border.
I don’t know about you but that seems like the most optimistic thing I’ve read in awhile. But don’t break out the champagne yet, this is going to take a long, long time even if everything breaks out way. Our next few presidents (even if they’re all two-termers) will probably be discussing these very same issues. But hey, nobody promised you a rose garden.